UC Santa Barbara
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
243  Daniella Moreno SR 20:30
867  Sarah Shreck JR 21:24
1,237  Bailey Miller SR 21:48
1,393  Kelsey O'Connell SO 21:57
1,417  Tori Tsolis JR 21:59
1,424  Jenna Hinkle FR 21:59
1,448  Sophie Smith FR 22:01
1,480  Maxine Goyette JR 22:03
1,687  Christine Cooperstein SR 22:14
1,792  Sophie Hartley FR 22:22
2,434  Rebekah Ent SO 23:03
3,371  Camille Petty SR 24:56
3,421  Betsy Armitage SO 25:08
3,497  Hallie Brauner SO 25:35
3,527  Kaitlin Large SO 25:42
3,658  Shamara Carney FR 26:40
3,694  Jennifer Burks FR 26:59
3,696  Kayla Campbell JR 27:00
3,752  Shannon Trumboll JR 27:53
3,789  Lolene Swallow FR 28:59
3,808  Hannah O'Connor FR 29:47
3,829  Jordan Davis FR 31:16
3,831  Kiely Gode FR 31:20
National Rank #128 of 341
West Region Rank #19 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 22nd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 27.9%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Daniella Moreno Sarah Shreck Bailey Miller Kelsey O'Connell Tori Tsolis Jenna Hinkle Sophie Smith Maxine Goyette Christine Cooperstein Sophie Hartley Rebekah Ent
CSU San Bernardino 09/27 21:37
Stanford Invitational 09/27 1096 20:11 21:33 22:21 22:28 22:01 22:11 22:33 21:54
ISU Pre-National Invitational (White) 10/18 1158 20:38 21:24 21:55 21:59 22:37 22:17 22:48
Bronco Invitational 10/18 21:40 21:45 21:42
CS Fullerton Titan 10/24 1617 23:02
Big West Championships 11/01 1136 20:38 21:18 21:34 21:46 22:20 22:09 21:47 21:37 21:51
West Region Championships 11/14 1222 21:20 22:35 22:06 21:32 21:51 22:35 21:52





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 22.0 632 0.1 0.5 1.3 3.1 4.8 7.5 10.6 13.0 14.5 14.1 11.9 9.8 5.7 2.2 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Daniella Moreno 0.3% 137.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Daniella Moreno 44.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.6 1.0 0.8 0.9
Sarah Shreck 117.4
Bailey Miller 152.5
Kelsey O'Connell 166.0
Tori Tsolis 167.9
Jenna Hinkle 168.0
Sophie Smith 171.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 0.1% 0.1 14
15 0.5% 0.5 15
16 1.3% 1.3 16
17 3.1% 3.1 17
18 4.8% 4.8 18
19 7.5% 7.5 19
20 10.6% 10.6 20
21 13.0% 13.0 21
22 14.5% 14.5 22
23 14.1% 14.1 23
24 11.9% 11.9 24
25 9.8% 9.8 25
26 5.7% 5.7 26
27 2.2% 2.2 27
28 0.8% 0.8 28
29 0.2% 0.2 29
30 0.0% 0.0 30
31 0.0% 0.0 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0